U.S. trade partners [should] ask the WTO for authority to impose countervailing duties on exports of U.S. steel and other energy-intensive products that benefit unfairly from Washington’s refusal to join the Kyoto Protocol limiting carbon and other greenhouse gasses.There is of course a slight downside to the proposal as it might mean US stepping out of WTO altogether or at least giving a strong populistic card to protectionist to play in US politics. Nobody would benefit from that. Witty point, nevertheless.
There is a precedent for such duties, Stiglitz said, because Washington previously obtained a World Trade Organization ruling in support of a U.S. ban on the import of shrimp caught in Thailand using nets that killed endangered species of turtles.
Clearly if you can impose a trade sanction to save a turtle, you can impose a trade sanction to save the planet.
Monday, October 02, 2006
Using WTO to stop climate change
Center of Global Development reports a great idea by Nobel laureate Joe Stiglitz:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment